Thursday, October 4, 2012

Scream Bloody Murder (1973)


AKA: "The Captive Female,” “Claw of Terror,” and “Matthew”

Directed by: Marc B. Ray

Starring: Fred Holbert, Leigh Mitchell, Robert Knox and Angus Scrimm

Genre: Horror, Thriller, Exploitation, Slasher

Rated: R

As a child, Matthew killed his father, managing to lose his hand in the process. Ten or fifteen years later, he is released from a mental institution, his hand replaced with a hook. Upon arriving home, he discovers that his mother has remarried. Angered by this revelation, Matthew embarks on a killing spree, only pausing when he meets Vera, a free-spirited artist and prostitute who greatly resembles his mother. After spending time with Vera, Matthew decides that he must have her, no matter what the cost.

The first half of this movie is a slasher, while the second half is basically Matthew holding Vera captive. The first kill is pretty cheesy, but they get slightly better as the film progresses. The gore effects, however, are pretty awful, with the blood almost watery in some scenes. Once Matthew acquires a house and kidnaps Vera, the film slows down and becomes more of a suspense piece between the two of them.

Clearly Matthew has Oedipal issues that need to be resolved, something the asylum he was in as a boy must never have thought to tackle. His character is rather grating, especially his whiney voice. He is also afraid of anything sexual, thinking any man touching a woman in a sexual nature is hurting her. He goes into attack mode whenever he witnesses people showing affection toward one another. Vera is a strong, intelligent woman, despite the fact that she is a prostitute (an uncommon combination in films such as this). She seems to have a big heart, but she’s also willing to fight for her own safety.

While the tagline, “When You’re In Her Business, Sooner Or Later, It Has To Happen!” makes it seem like Vera was asking for this psycho to abduct her, the film doesn’t portray it that way. Vera is a much more sympathetic character than Matthew, and I longed for her to be able to escape his clutches. I loved that she was stubborn and resilient, despite her fear of Matthew and his psychotic rage. She spits food in his face when he tries to force feed her, and her escape attempts are honorable. Especially when, bound hand and foot, she manages to limbo out of the ropes binding her to a chair, hop downstairs, make her way to the telephone, use it to pull the gag from her mouth, then use her tongue to dial the operator for help. Some people find this scene laughable, but it’s a heck of a lot more than most damsels-in-distress do. I found the scene suspenseful and her efforts admirable.

The acting in this film wasn’t the greatest, but this is bottom-of-the-barrel grindhouse sleaze, so what do you expect? Holbert gives a decent performance as the perpetually childish, psychotic Matthew and his line delivery in a few scenes makes the film. For example, his calm, casual delivery of this line when Vera refuses to eat, “Eat, or I’ll cut your tongue from your mouth.” He ranges from this to a child-like tantrum when he brings Vera his gifts and she isn’t impressed, “See what I do for you? I get groceries and clothes and art stuff and kill people. And do you appreciate it? No!” (I can’t help it; I laughed at this line, a lot.) Leigh Mitchell kept up a strong performance as Vera, varying from friendly free spirit to fearful (but not pathetic) damsel to seductress. However, her portrayal of Matthew’s mother was very weak – though, in all honesty, so was his mother. The worst performance by far was from Robert Knox as Matthew’s stepfather – wooden and unable to express emotion, even fear. His shocked expression is almost laugh-inducing. 

This film also had its random moments, some funny, such as the dual-cane wielding old woman (whom the viewer and Matthew believed to be bed-ridden) and Matthew’s apparent ability to teleport at the end of the movie. There was an unnecessary scene where he killed the old woman’s dog – a dog that wasn’t doing anything to him. That scene felt like it had just been thrown in for shock value and could have been left out without marring the film in any way. 

There is no nudity in this flick, so if that’s what you’re looking for, you’re in the wrong place. The most you will see is Mitchell’s bare back when she’s getting ready to bathe, and even though she is supposedly naked, you can see the top of her underwear. It’s important to distinguish this from many other exploitation films of the era that dealt with rape and women held captive. Matthew kidnaps Vera because he wants a live-in companion, a friend, and a mother-like figure. He is attracted to her, but his fear of sex and the way he views her keeps him from trying anything sexual – something a little different for that sub-genre.

Overall, this was an okay flick. The performances were decent, some dialogue and scenes unintentionally funny, and the character of Vera was very likable. There was also a decent amount of suspense, despite the bad special effects and overall cheese.

5/10



Looper (2012)


Directed by: Rian Johnson

Starring: Bruce Willis, Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Emily Blunt, Piper Perabo, and Jeff Daniels

Genre: Science Fiction, Action/Adventure, Thriller

Rated: R

By the year 2072, time travel will have been invented and the use of it banned. Only the biggest criminals will use it as a way of killing off their targets and disposing of the bodies. Enter Joe (Gordon-Levitt) a looper, who lives in the year 2042 and kills these people as they appear before him. However, his life of casually killing comes to an end when he encounters his future self (Willis). When his loop escapes, Joe realizes he has to find his older self and kill him in order to get his own life back.

I didn’t know what to think of this film going into it. I had seen minimal promotion for it and only had a basic grasp of the plot, which seemed interesting. Plus, I enjoy both Bruce Willis and Joseph Gordon-Levitt as actors, so I figured it was worth a watch. I came out of it satisfied with my choice.

One of the things that struck me about this film is how even though none of the characters are really that likable, I still managed to care for them. Joe is a selfish person, driven by anger from his past, and greed. He takes drugs and kills people for a living and only slowly begins to grow a conscience as the movie progresses. Old Joe isn’t much better, as his focus on preventing something from happening in the future takes him back to the ways he’d long given up for love. Sara (Blunt) is a recovering addict trying to raise a son that resents her, which would be attractive if she wasn’t such a dishonest person. Yet somehow, Johnson has written these characters so that despite their flaws, the audience still wants things to work out in their favor. He was also able to create enough suspense that I tensed up, worried for them and wanting them to make it out of bad situations.

Joseph Gordon-Levitt was an amazing lead for this film. He was able to capture Bruce Willis’s mannerisms and make me believe they were the same person. He made a believable assassin, which I never would have pictured him playing prior to this. He carried the film with ease and truly has that leading man charisma. British actress Emily Blunt was able to pull off a believable American accent. She also did very well as the troubled young mother looking to protect her child from the nastiness in the world. While Bruce Willis did a great job with the action sequences, I would have liked to see him express more emotion, such as during the scenes with his wife. (Though, in all fairness, a trained assassin probably has a very hard time doing such a thing.) Still, it would have made his character a little more sympathetic.

While this is an action movie, I wouldn’t call it a typical film of the genre. There is a lot more going on than scenes of violence and explosions. Our characters do develop and relationships are formed. Despite the fact that Joe originally comes off as heartless, there’s no denying that he cares for Sara and her son, Cid, even if he acts like his only motivation is to kill his loop and get his life back.

The action sequences themselves were very well done. I thought the filmmakers did a good job spacing them out so the viewer didn’t get an action overload. This gives the audience a chance to get involved with the characters and the aforementioned relationships between them, without constantly being distracted by violence or explosions.

The one scene I found jarring was the sex scene between Joe and Sara. It felt very out of place. I know it was probably there to show she has gained a trust for him and demonstrate their budding relationship, but I feel that could have been done another way. His scenes with Cid were enough to establish the connection, as well as the conversations between him and Sara. I think the movie would have been just as good without it.

Overall, aside from the unnecessary sex scene, the film was very entertaining. The acting, pacing, and writing were great and the concept was original. I hope to see more films like this in the future. 

7/10