Showing posts with label Romance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Romance. Show all posts

Friday, April 28, 2023

Spread (2009)

 

Directed by: David Mackenzie

Starring: Ashton Kutcher, Anne Heche, Margarita Levieva, Sebastian Stan and Ashley Johnson

Genre: Comedy, Drama, Romance

Rated: R

Nikki is a womanizing playboy sleeping his way through LA. An attractive man in his late twenties to early thirties, he lives out of a backpack, seducing older, successful women in order to find a place to stay. The film follows him and his current conquest, Samantha, a beautiful, wealthy attorney with a mansion and a Mercedes. He quickly wins her over at a club and worms his way into being her kept boy, living in her house, spending her money, and cheating on her whenever she’s not around. It isn’t until he meets Heather, a waitress that rebuffs his attempts to woo her, that he decides he might want something more. Can he change his womanizing ways and get the girl or is there more to Heather than he expected?

Ugh, the shit I will subject myself to when I really like an actor – I will literally watch anything that person is in. 

Damn it, Sebastian!

I was bored, it was late at night, and this was free on Tubi, so I figured ‘what the hell? Could be okay.’ It wasn’t.

Ashton Kutcher leads the film as Nikki and I honestly didn’t find him that believable. He is objectively attractive but his charms and the voice he chose to use for Nikki don’t work for me. (Someone on IMDb described his voice as a Lifetime movie drug addict, and yeah, that’s accurate.) However, I’m not sure another actor could do much better considering how Nikki is written. The actors can only do so much with the script and direction they’re given.

It doesn’t help Nikki’s likeability factor that he narrates the film so the audience is in his head hearing whatever insipid thought and Pick Up Artist bullshit he comes up with. He’s such an arrogant asshole throughout 75 – 80% of the movie. He treats women as disposable sex toys and his one true friend like his personal assistant. I don’t see how he has so many women falling all over themselves to be with him or how he’s gotten away with literally treating everyone so poorly, when almost everyone he encounters is a better, more successful person than him.

Nikki is a hobosexual in designer clothes with a supposedly silver tongue and he's annoying as hell. By the time his world begins crashing around him, I was giddy at the thought of him finally getting his comeuppance. The attempt at a redemption arc is weak because it feels forced – the first half of the film gives no indications that Nikki would ever want to give up his lifestyle. He does because he runs out of options.

Anne Heche’s Samantha seems way too smart to fall for Nikki’s advances. She tries to get away from him more than once, but I guess she finds his persistence charming and endearing rather than irritating and creepy. He wins her over in a matter of minutes and she takes him home where they have lots of sex and he explains in a voiceover how he works his way into staying with these women long term. I don’t find it realistic that a woman like Samantha would be so easily duped. The story leans heavily on the idea that Samantha is very insecure and Nikki definitely takes advantage of that, using her feelings for him and her insecurities against her whenever he gets caught doing something shitty. After she catches him cheating, they fight then have make up sex, and she continues to let him stay. At that point I stated out loud to my empty living room, “The dick can’t be that fucking good! Kick his ass out!” She even gets vaginal reconstruction surgery to “tighten her up” down there – I guess she thinks he prefers the younger women he cheats with because they are tighter? 

He cheats because he’s an asshole using you for your money. He doesn’t respect you and definitely doesn’t love you.

The somewhat pathetic actions of this character contrast with the way Heche plays her. Heche gives her a strong, confident air that gives the impression she doesn’t put up with anyone’s shit. Nothing in what she says or the way she carries herself as the character would indicate any weakness or self doubt. She made Samantha feel like an actual person when the script didn’t call for her to do something ridiculous like jump the bones of the man she just caught cheating or get vaginal reconstruction surgery out of nowhere. Samantha deserves better.

Eating lunch in a diner, Nikki’s wandering eye lands on Heather, his waitress who is very unimpressed with his efforts to flirt with her. She continues to impress him by thwarting all of his usual techniques. At first I thought she was messing with him, giving him a taste of his own medicine since he wouldn’t take no for an answer and leave her the hell alone. Sadly, that is not the case. The two do engage in a whirlwind romance, despite him being creepily pushy and, on the night it seems like he’s getting what he wanted, calling her a whore because he thinks she has a boyfriend and kicking her out of Samantha’s house. Hypocrite, much?

The Only Appropriate Response to Nikki ... Ever

Margarita Levieva brings charm and sass to the role of Heather. She gives Heather an assertive exterior, one that isn’t easily ruffled by weak pick up lines and cheap tactics. She’s fun at first, but she has her share of secrets too, secrets that push her and Nikki closer together. Levieva also breaks this façade to show vulnerability when the occasion calls for it. The issue is there isn’t much chemistry between her and Ashton Kutcher. That on top of his character being an absolute dickhead really makes it hard to root for them as a couple.

The character that gets screwed over the most is Harry, Nikki’s best friend, loyal to a fault and treated like shit. Anything Nikki wants, Harry will do. You need me to drive this drunk ex fling home so she won’t talk to the other girls you’re trying to hook up with? Fine. You need me to be your wingman while you try to hook up with the waitress at the diner? Sure. You need to store your belongings at my apartment while you live as some rich lady’s boy toy? Okay. Time after time he does what Nikki asks and Nikki is a dick to him, teasing him about his shyness with women and his pet frogs, whining about how his things smell after being stored in Harry’s apartment, bossing him around. I was so happy when Harry began to stand up for himself. I feel like nothing good really happens for Harry, but I want to believe the last scene with him and Eva awkwardly staring at each other led to them getting together.

The hardest thing to believe about Harry is that women never approach him. He’s played by Sebastian Stan and this film wants us to believe he can’t catch a single woman’s attention? 

You mean to tell me THIS GUY can't attract a woman?!
Whatever you say, movie. (Source)

Yeah, okay. I get that he’s shy and quiet, but I guarantee there would still be a line of women hoping to break him out of his shell.

I know who I'd choose. However, I too am very shy. 
On the odd chance there was a mutual attraction
we'd probably stare awkwardly at each other forever.

While Harry is a stalwart and true friend to Nikki, Sebastian Stan gives him an undercurrent of being sick of Nikki’s shit. Its exhausting being Nikki’s best friend and Harry begins to let his irritation with Nikki show more and more with each scene they share. When Harry finally blows up at Nikki, the only one surprised is Nikki. 

Gif Source

------------------------------------


I was so proud of him here.
(Gif Set Source)

Harry could have been a one note character, and with another actor portraying him he might have been, but Sebastian Stan has such an attention grabbing presence even a rather boring and flat character on paper can feel like a real person.

Ashley Johnson shows up in the last act as Heather’s stoner roommate Eva who agrees to help Nikki in the cliché rom-com trope of chasing Heather down to prove his love for her. She’s bubbly and cute, providing a little bit of comic relief, but Ashley Johnson is what makes the character memorable.

While this is marketed as a sex comedy, I was absolutely not prepared for just how much sex there would be. The first half of the movie is mostly sex scenes with Nikki banging various women in Samantha’s house. There are a lot of naked women, with a very unexpected and graphic close up of Anne Heche full frontal being pleasured, and a few shots of Ashton Kutcher’s bare ass. It’s basically a soft-core porno with a minor amount of plot for the first forty minutes or so. How this managed an R rating is beyond me. 


At about the halfway mark the film switches gears and becomes more of a drama as Nikki’s reality begins to crumble. There is little to no comedy to be found.

The film seems to be trying to comment on the shallow, vapid lives of the wealthy and those who long for it, but the attempts fall flat. It focuses too much on Nikki and his conquests, spending so much time depicting him as an obnoxious douche bag the viewer can’t stand him and doesn’t care if he finds a way to win the girl and redeem himself. Women are all portrayed as gold diggers willing to give it up to any rich man or as lonely middle-aged women, who despite all their successes rely on young men to silence their insecurities by treating them as sexual objects. We’re nothing if men don’t want to have sex with us, don’t ya know?


The cinematography is nice with pretty shots of the LA skyline and the set for Samantha’s house, while too modern for my tastes, was still very beautiful. Aside from that and the few decent performances listed above, there’s nothing good about this movie. The plot is weak, the main character unlikable at best, and the rest only elevated by the aforementioned performances. Unless you’re a huge fan of one of the actors involved and insist on seeing everything they’ve ever been in, skip this one.

4/10

Thursday, April 28, 2016

Peace, Love, & Misunderstanding (2011)

Directed by: Bruce Beresford

Starring: Jane Fonda, Catherine Keener, Jeffrey Dean Morgan, Elizabeth Olsen, Chase Crawford, Nat Wolff, Marissa O'Donnell, Rosanna Arquette and Kyle McLachlan

Genre: Comedy, Drama, Romance

Rated: R

When her husband announces he wants a divorce, uptight New York City attorney, Diane Hudson, packs her young adult children in the car and takes them on a vacation to stay with her eccentric, hippie mother in Woodstock. Having been estranged from her mother, Grace, for twenty years, Diane has a hard time coming home and an even more difficult time understanding what brought her back. Slowly, but surely, the charms of her hometown start to loosen her up, as she and her children begin to explore themselves and find out who they really are.

Fair warning, this film contains male nudity, alcohol consumption, marijuana consumption, pagan spirituality and a lot of liberal politics. If any of that bothers you, you may want to avoid this one. The rest of you, please follow me as we continue with the review. 

I wasn't sure what to expect going into this film, but I'm glad I decided to watch it. I was in need of a relaxing, feel-good film with relatable, likable characters and a decent plot and this film delivered. I enjoy films that take me on a journey of self-discovery and letting go of the past with the characters, and Diane is reluctantly leading the way, with her daughter, Zoe, and son, Jake, not far behind.

Diane is the exact opposite of her mother, Grace, and has spent forty years resenting Grace for her free spirit, obsession with art, sexual nature, marijuana use, and liberal politics. Despite staying with Grace, she doesn't want Grace rubbing off on Zoe and Jake, not seeming to realize her kids may have minds of their own. It takes a few days, good company with free spirited ladies, and a budding relationship with Jude, a man very much her opposite, to get Diane to unwind and begin to let go. Once she starts, she can never really stop, even when she returns to her stuffy New York City life.

Zoe reluctantly begins to fall for Cole, an educated, organic food pushing, peace loving young man who works at the local butcher shop - a career choice Zoe has a hard time supporting as she appears to be either vegetarian or vegan. (The film isn't clear on which, but Zoe is very upset about the thought of killing animals.) She's conflicted despite Cole's explanation for why he does what he does and has a hard time determining if she wants to be with him or not.

The ladies of the Hudson family aren't the only ones to find relationships in Woodstock, as shy, nerdy teenager Jake meets his equally shy and nerdy muse, Tara, at an anti-war protest. Tara, in turn, inspires him to create his first short film with the footage he's constantly collecting with his video camera while vacationing in Woodstock. 

This film made me want to move to this fictionalized version of Woodstock. While I'm not much for smoking pot, I do enjoy enlightened, liberal minded, free spirits who prefer to promote peace and love and supporting one another, rather than fighting, hating and judging one another. The background characters, Grace, Jude, Cole and Tara are all relaxed, happy people who just go about their lives living as they want and enjoying life's natural beauty. These folks are what the Hudson family needs to help them shake off their negative energy and find relaxing positivity and happiness. Jude explains it best when he tells Diane, "you are so caught up in fighting everyone that you can't let in those who love you the most ... Let it go. ... The fight is like a sandbag you need to release in order for the balloon to float into the sky." (This is a bit paraphrased, not an exact quote.) 

The acting was done well, and all actors were perfectly cast. Jane Fonda embodies all that is lively, fun and free within Grace, and really brings the character to life. Catherine Keener does well as the uptight Diane, knowing how to show Diane's slow evolution into a freer spirit as it gradually happens. In the beginning of the film, her face is tight, wan and stressed, but as the film progresses her face becomes less severe, brighter though still serious, until she is finally able to smile. Elizabeth Olsen's performance is similar, though she's more light-hearted, she is still closed off when it comes to love, and again, appears to become happier as her character opens herself up to new ideas and experiences. Nat Wolff is adorably awkward, making Jake a relatable film geek that doesn't have the first clue how to approach a girl. Lastly, Jeffrey Dean Morgan is ridiculously charming as hippie musician and carpenter, Jude, bringing a gentle softness to the character that is refreshing for me as I am used to his gruff portrayal of John Winchester on Supernatural

I really liked that while everyone still paired off with their perfect mate, the sole purpose was not about finding romantic love. It was about finding oneself through a community of peers, some of whom think differently than you do, but can teach you a lot about yourself if you're willing to open yourself up and listen. Yes, Zoe and Diane find this through romantic partners, but it is their relationship with Grace that loosens them up enough to accept these men who are far different from who they believe themselves to be. I felt the message of the film was more, "In order to have a successful relationship, you need to embrace yourself, open yourself up to new experiences and ideas, find someone who builds you up and embraces you for you, and embrace them for who they are in turn." Which is a much better message than the typical, "Romantic love is all you need." This is a film that promotes all kinds of love, whether it is the love of a family, the love of a community, or romantic love. We all need a variety of love and support in our lives, and it is nice that this film doesn't negate any form in which love and peace can be found. 

Overall, this was an enjoyable watch film that promotes self discovery, inner peace, and a variety of love ranging from that of your community, your friends, a romantic partner and your family. I found this movie heart-warming and inspiring. I will likely be making another visit to this version of Woodstock someday. 


7/10

Thursday, June 30, 2011

Faithful (1996)


Directed by: Paul Mazursky
Starring: Cher, Chazz Palminteri, and Ryan O’Neal
Genre: Romance, Comedy, Crime
Rated: R

Maggie (Cher) is a rich housewife suffering from depression. She knows her husband, Jack (O’Neal) is being unfaithful, and on their twentieth wedding anniversary, decides to kill herself. Enter Tony (Palminteri), the professional hit man that Jack has hired to kill her. The film follows the blossoming relationship between captor and captive as they await the phone call signaling Tony to do the deed.
This is a slight twist on the cliché plotline of “spouse-hires-hit man-to kill-spouse.” For one thing, the hit man has issues that need to be explored and has various conversations with his therapist throughout the film. For another, he’s not supposed to be tempted to switch sides. Will he or won’t he?
They really tried to make the character of Tony likable, but I just found him quirky and clichéd. Palminteri overacts a little in places as well, making him a weaker character. I didn’t feel much chemistry between him and Cher either – which could have greatly helped the film. Maggie is a believable character, who becomes more likable as the story progresses and she becomes stronger. Cher gives her a strong presence, which takes talent as the character spends half of the movie tied to a chair. Jack – the husband – has no redeeming qualities, and it feels as though O’Neil didn’t even like the character enough to really portray him. His performance was very wooden – and the appearance of his character in the last third of the film took away from what little the film had going for it.
I really liked how Maggie becomes more empowered and recognizes it as the movie rolls on. She learns that she can be strong and Jack is just a waste of skin. The last third of the film is fairly predictable, but I liked the very ending – it didn’t end like I figured it would, with the typical sappy Hollywood conclusion. That made me happy.
This was an okay film, but some of the performances could have been better. The only character I really cared for was Maggie. Both the scenes between Maggie and Tony and the ending were done well, but the parts with the husband disrupted the flow of what could have been a higher rated film.

5.5/10